Primary Care Utilization, Preventative Screening, and Control of Metabolic Syndrome in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Liver Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with pre-transplant metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are at high risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) after liver transplant. While many patients are co-managed by a transplant team, most preventative screening and MetS management may occur in the primary care setting. We aimed to evaluate primary care utilization by MASH liver transplant recipients as well as MetS screening and control. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review that included adults who underwent liver transplant for MASH or cryptogenic cirrhosis at a single institution from January 2010 to December 2016, had available primary care data, and at least 36-months of follow-up post-transplant. Measures included primary care utilization, adherence to screening guidelines, and control of MetS. We used Fischer's exact test to explore the association of primary care utilization with screening and control. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients met inclusion criteria with 366 visits reviewed. The median time to first visit was 68 days post-transplant and patients had a median of 9 total visits. Few patients met screening guidelines for diabetes (8.1%) or hyperlipidemia (10.8%). The percentage of patients with control of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia decreased over the 36-month follow-up period. Primary care utilization was not associated with adherence to screening recommendations for diabetes (P = .141) or hyperlipidemia (P = .103). Higher primary care utilization was not associated with control of hypertension (P = .107), diabetes (P = .871), or hyperlipidemia (P = .999). CONCLUSION: More research is needed to investigate barriers to screening and management of MetS conditions in this high-risk patient population in the primary care setting as well as to optimize post-transplant care coordination.

Underrecognition and Suboptimal Quality of Care for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Cirrhosis in Primary Care Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading cause of cirrhosis but is underrecognized in primary care. Cirrhosis management requires complex monitoring, and the quality of care (QoC) for NAFLD cirrhosis patients in primary care may be inadequate. METHODS: In this retrospective-prospective cohort study of primary care patients with diabetes mellitus, we identified patients with NAFLD cirrhosis by 1) evidence of cirrhosis from abdominal imaging identified by natural language processing, or 2) existence of International Classification of Diseases code for cirrhosis. A finding of either was followed by manual chart review for confirmation of both cirrhosis and NAFLD. We then determined if cirrhosis care measures were up-to-date, including hepatitis A and B vaccination, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score components, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and hepatocellular carcinoma screening. We created a composite score quantifying overall QoC (scale 0-8), with high QoC defined as ≥6 points. RESULTS: Among 3,028 primary care patients with diabetes mellitus, we identified 51 (1.7%) with NAFLD cirrhosis. Although 78% had ≥3 average primary care visits/year, only 24% completed hepatocellular carcinoma screening at least annually in at least 75% of years since diagnosis. The average QoC composite score was 4.9 (SD 2.4), and less than one-third had high QoC. CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD cirrhosis is prevalent but underdiagnosed in primary care, and receipt of comprehensive QoC was suboptimal. Given the rising incidence of NAFLD cirrhosis, primary care providers need improved awareness and mechanisms to ensure high QoC for this population.

Defining an approach for therapeutic strategies in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease after liver transplantation.

Occurrence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is common following liver transplantation (LT). MASLD can be classified as a recurrent disease when it occurs in patients receiving LT for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) or as de novo when it occurs in patients undergoing transplantation for non-metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis etiologies of liver disease. Fibrosis progression in patients with MASLD is accelerated, with progression to cirrhosis occurring more rapidly compared with the general (ie, non-LT) population. Moreover, the metabolic burden in LT recipients with MASLD is high and synergizes with liver disease to negatively affect the clinical course. Despite the oversized clinical burden of MASLD among LT recipients, there is currently a lack of regulatory approach and pathway for therapeutics development in this patient population. The present document, thus, provides guidance for therapeutics development that incorporates nuances of transplant care in patients with post-LT MASLD to facilitate drug development.

Prospective study of a case-finding algorithm to detect NAFLD with advanced fibrosis in primary care patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Primary care providers need strategies to identify NAFLD patients and select for specialty referral, but proposed algorithms have only been studied in established NAFLD patients. METHODS: We implemented an algorithm for all adults with diabetes mellitus in a large primary care practice and excluded hepatitis B and C or alcohol use. Applying annual Fibrosis-4 Index and NAFLD Fibrosis Score for 5 years, we categorized patients as low-risk, indeterminate-risk, or high-risk for advanced fibrosis. We targeted all high-risk and messaged each primary care provider, recommending hepatology linkage. We collected final diagnosis and fibrosis (F0-4) outcomes. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed risk factors for advanced fibrosis stage (F3-4). RESULTS: Of 3028 patients, 1018 were low-risk, 577 indeterminate-risk, and 611 high-risk. There were 264 target patients; their 89 primary care providers received a message per patient suggesting hepatology referral. The majority (n=149) were referred; at triage, 118 were deemed likely NAFLD. Of these, 90 completed visits, 78/90 were diagnosed as NAFLD, and 69/78 underwent fibrosis staging, with F3 to 4 in 25/69. In multivariable analysis, hemoglobin A1c ≥8% (OR=7.02, 95% CI: 1.29-38.18) and Fibrosis-4 Index (OR=1.79, 95% CI: 1.07-2.99) were associated with increased risk of F3 to 4. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study testing a case-finding strategy in primary care and almost 1/3 of diabetes mellitus were high-risk for advanced fibrosis. When prompted, 73% of primary care providers placed referrals and 76% of patients completed visits, revealing 86% NAFLD and 36% F3 to 4. This study demonstrates the readiness for such a strategy in primary care; integrating hemoglobin A1c into this algorithm may further improve the performance of Fibrosis-4 Index in this setting.

CT-quantified sarcopenic visceral obesity is associated with poor transplant waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Sarcopenic obesity is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality than seen with either sarcopenia or obesity alone. We aimed to define sarcopenic visceral obesity (SVO) using CT-quantified skeletal muscle index and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio and to examine its association with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Included were 326 adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation in the ambulatory setting with available abdominal CT within 6 months from enrollment between February 2015 and January 2018. SVO was defined as patients with sarcopenia (skeletal muscle index <50 cm 2 /m 2 in men and <39 cm 2 /m 2 in women) and visceral obesity (visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio ≥1.21 in men and ≥0.48 in women). The percentage who met criteria for sarcopenia, visceral obesity, and SVO were 44%, 29%, and 13%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality was higher in patients with SVO compared to patients with sarcopenia without visceral obesity or visceral obesity without sarcopenia at 12 months (40% vs. 21% vs. 12%) (overall logrank p =0.003). In univariable Cox regression, SVO was associated with waitlist mortality (HR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.58-7.39), which remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, ascites, encephalopathy, MELDNa, liver frailty index, and different body compositions (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.11-6.30). SVO was associated with increase waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis in the ambulatory setting awaiting liver transplantation. Concurrent loss of skeletal muscle and gain of adipose tissue seen in SVO quantified by CT may be a useful and objective measurement to identify patients at risk for suboptimal pretransplant outcomes.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer and pseudocirrhosis: a single center retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Pseudocirrhosis is a term used to describe changes in hepatic contour that mimic cirrhosis radiographically, but lack the classic pathologic features of cirrhosis. This radiographic finding is frequently found in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but the risk factors and clinical consequences are poorly understood. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we identified patients with MBC and pseudocirrhosis who were treated at a single center from 2002 to 2021. We used chart extraction and radiology review to determine demographic characteristics, treatment history, imaging features, and complications of pseudocirrhosis. RESULTS: 120 patients with MBC and pseudocirrhosis were identified with the following BC subtypes: hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative (n = 99, 82.5%), HR+/HER2+ (n = 14, 11.7%), HR- /HER2+ (n = 3, 2.5%), and triple negative (TNBC; n = 4, 3.3%). All patients had liver metastases and 82.5% (n = 99) had > 15 liver lesions. Thirty-six patients (30%) presented with de novo metastatic disease. Median time from MBC diagnosis to pseudocirrhosis was 29.2 months. 50% of patients had stable or responding disease at the time of pseudocirrhosis diagnosis. Sequelae of pseudocirrhosis included radiographic ascites (n = 97, 80.8%), gastric/esophageal varices (n = 68, 56.7%), splenomegaly (n = 26, 21.7%), GI bleeding (n = 12, 10.0%), and hepatic encephalopathy (n = 11, 9.2%). Median survival was 7.9 months after pseudocirrhosis diagnosis. Radiographic ascites was associated with shorter survival compared to no radiographic ascites (42.8 vs. 76.2 months, p = < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest case series of patients with MBC and pseudocirrhosis. Nearly all patients had HR+ MBC and extensive liver metastases. Survival was short after pseudocirrhosis and prognosis worse with radiographic ascites.

Factors Impacting Survival in Those Transplanted for NASH Cirrhosis: Data From the NailNASH Consortium.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the leading indication for liver transplant (LT) in women and the elderly. Granular details into factors impacting survival in this population are needed to optimize management and improve outcomes. METHODS: Patients receiving LT for NASH cirrhosis from 1997 to 2017 across 7 transplant centers (NailNASH consortium) were analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and causes of death were enumerated. All outcomes were cross referenced with United Network for Organ Sharing and adjudicated at each individual center. Cox regression models were constructed to elucidate clinical factors impacting mortality. RESULTS: Nine hundred thirty-eight patients with a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range, 1.60-7.05 years) were included. The 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival of the cohort was 93%, 88%, 83%, 69%, and 46%, respectively. Of 195 deaths in the cohort, the most common causes were infection (19%), cardiovascular disease (18%), cancer (17%), and liver-related (11%). Inferior survival was noted in patients >65 years. On multivariable analysis, age >65 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.77; P = .04), end-stage renal disease (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.04-2.31; P = .03), black race (HR, 5.25; 95% CI, 2.12-12.96; P = .0003), and non-calcineurin inhibitors-based regimens (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.19-3.51; P = .009) were associated with increased mortality. Statin use after LT favorably impacted survival (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.75; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite excellent long-term survival, patients transplanted for NASH at >65 years or with type 2 diabetes mellitus at transplant had higher mortality. Statin use after transplant attenuated risk and was associated with improved survival across all subgroups, suggesting that careful patient selection and implementation of protocol-based management of metabolic comorbidities may further improve clinical outcomes.

Primary Care Providers and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Needs Assessment Survey.

BACKGROUND: Primary care providers (PCPs) face increasing numbers of patients at risk for NAFLD and are responsible for the detection of NAFLD and the decision on referral to specialists. We conducted a PCP needs assessment to ascertain the barriers and desired supports for NAFLD in primary care. METHODS: We designed a cross-sectional study of PCPs at a large diverse health system and surveyed faculty, residents, and nurse practitioners. Questions assessed NAFLD knowledge, approach to diagnosis and fibrosis testing including use of FIB-4, and attitudes toward support tools. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 115 PCPs with an 80% (n = 92) response rate. Respondents were 52% faculty and 48% residents. Over 40% were unsure of which diagnostic tests to order and which data constituted a diagnosis. PCPs were aware of the importance of fibrosis, yet few knew the components of FIB-4, few used FIB-4 in practice, and yet the most common reason for referral was to obtain fibrosis staging. The majority showed high levels of interest toward possible tools to improve NAFLD management, and only 5% perceived lack of time to be a barrier. DISCUSSION: Our survey revealed PCPs need and want strategic approaches to NAFLD. We found PCPs lack confidence in diagnosing NAFLD and are inconsistent in management strategies. PCPs had high awareness of the importance of fibrosis, but not of the FIB-4. It was encouraging that PCPs reported that time was not a major barrier and had positive attitudes toward potential practice support tools, indicating that practice guidelines designed for primary care should be created.

Diagnosis and Management of Drug-Induced Liver Injury After the Use of Polygonum multiflorum.

Polygonum multiflorum, a species of flowering plant in the buckwheat family, is widely used in alternative medicine. However, a growing body of literature has implicated P. multiflorum as a cause of drug-induced liver injury. We report a case of successful treatment of a drug-induced liver injury after consumption of an herbal tea containing P. multiflorum.

Comparison of clinical prediction rules for ruling out cirrhosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cirrhosis benefit from referral to subspecialty care. While several clinical prediction rules exist to identify advanced fibrosis, the cutoff for excluding cirrhosis due to NAFLD is unclear. This analysis compared clinical prediction rules for excluding biopsy-proven cirrhosis in NAFLD. METHODS: Adult patients were enrolled in the NASH Clinical Research Network (US) and the Newcastle Cohort (UK). Clinical and laboratory data were collected at enrolment, and a liver biopsy was taken within 1 year of enrolment. Optimal cutoffs for each score (eg, FIB-4) to exclude cirrhosis were derived from the US cohort, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and AUROC were calculated. The cutoffs were evaluated in the UK cohort. RESULTS: 147/1483 (10%) patients in the US cohort had cirrhosis. All prediction rules had similarly high NPV (0.95-0.97). FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis scores were the most accurate in characterising patients as having cirrhosis (AUROC 0.84-0.86). 59/494 (12%) patients in the UK cohort had cirrhosis. Prediction rules had high NPV (0.92-0.96), and FIB-4 and NAFLD fibrosis score the most accurate in the prediction of cirrhosis in the UK cohort (AUROC 0.87-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional analysis of large, multicentre international datasets shows that current clinical prediction rules perform well in excluding cirrhosis with appropriately chosen cutoffs. These clinical prediction rules can be used in primary care to identify patients, particularly those who are white, female, and <65, unlikely to have cirrhosis so higher-risk patients maintain access to specialty care.

Obesity Management of Liver Transplant Waitlist Candidates and Recipients.

Obesity is increasing in prevalence in liver transplant candidates and recipients. The rise in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reflects this increase. Management of obesity in liver transplant candidates can be challenging due to the presence of decompensated cirrhosis and sarcopenia. Obesity may increase peritransplant morbidity but does not have an impact on long-term post-transplant survival. Bariatric surgery may be a feasible option in select patients before, during, or after liver transplantation. Use of weight loss drugs and/or endoscopic therapies for obesity management ultimately may play a role in liver transplant patients, but more research is needed to determine safety.

Nonviral liver disease is the leading indication for liver transplant in the United States in persons living with human immunodeficiency virus.

We evaluated whether indications for liver transplantation (LT) have changed among people with/without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and compared LT outcomes and trends by HIV serostatus. LT recipients (2008-2018) from the United Network for Organ Sharing and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS/OPTN) were identifed. Among 62 195 LT recipients, 352 (0.6%) were HIV-infected. The proportion of HIV-infected patients increased over time (P trend = .001), as did the number of transplant centers performing LT for HIV-infected recipients; average annual percentage change of 9.2% (p < .001). Nonviral causes became the leading indication in 2015 for HIV-uninfected and in 2018 for HIV-infected (P trend < .001). Three-year cumulative patient survival rates were 77.5%, for HIV-infected and 84.6%, for HIV-uninfected (p = .15). Over time, graft and patient survival rates improved for both HIV-infected and uninfected (p < .001). Among HCV-infected LT recipients, 3-year patient survival rates were 72.5% for HIV-infected and 81.8% for HIV-uninfected (p = .02). However, in a subanalysis restricted to 2014-2018, differences in graft and patient survival by HIV serostatus were no longer observed (3-year patient survival rates were 81.2% for HIV-infected and 86.4% for HIV-uninfected, p = .34). In conclusion, in the United States, nonviral liver disease is now the leading indication for LT in HIV-infected patients, and posttransplant outcomes have improved over time.

Disseminated Legionella micdadei infection in a liver transplant patient presenting as pulmonary nodules and a laryngeal lesion.

We report a liver transplant patient with disseminated Legionella micdadei infection with pulmonary, laryngeal, and suspected muscle involvement. This organism, which stains weakly acid-fast, primarily affects immunocompromised patients. The diagnosis is difficult to make; in this case, the organism was identified via molecular diagnostics on laryngeal and pulmonary biopsy tissue.